This biological age test asks 19 questions about the things you actually control: what you eat, how you move, and a handful of daily habits. Diet covers whole grains, legumes, nuts and olive oil, fish, eggs, red and processed meat, and sugary drinks. Movement covers walking, aerobic exercise, high-intensity intervals, and strength training. The rest covers coffee, tea, sauna use, flossing, and smoking.
It does not ask for blood work, a saliva sample, or a DNA swab. Every answer is something you already know without a lab.
Each answer carries a hazard ratio taken from published cohort studies, which is the measured change in mortality risk associated with that habit. Your answers are combined into a single risk figure, and that figure is applied to actuarial life tables for your age and sex.
The result is a projected lifespan, the years your current habits have already added compared with an average person of the same age and sex, and the years still within reach if you improved every answer. More than 20,000 people have now taken the test.
Most tests sold as biological age tests measure biomarkers: methylation patterns, inflammatory markers, or organ panels. They tell you where your body is now, and they need a lab.
This one works the other way round. It measures the behaviours that drive those markers and converts them into years. That makes it free and instant, and it makes the output actionable, since every input is something you can change this week. It also means it cannot detect a problem you have no symptoms of. The two approaches answer different questions and are worth using together.
The honest answer is that it is a model, not a prediction about you personally. Hazard ratios come from population studies, and a population average will never capture one individual. Some factors rest on stronger evidence than others: the walking, smoking, and strength training figures come from large well-replicated cohorts, while the sauna evidence is Finnish observational data and is treated as weaker.
Effects also overlap rather than stack. Sauna use, for example, adds nothing measurable for someone who already does aerobic exercise, and the model accounts for that instead of counting the benefit twice. Treat the number as a ranked list of what would buy you the most years, not as a date on a calendar. Individual results vary!
Created by Crissman Loomis for Unaging.
Join the Unaging Challenge and get evidence-based longevity tips delivered to your inbox.
Input your search keywords and press Enter.